Energy loss investigations (Mainz 2001)


Click here to start

Content

Titel

Page 2 - Outline

Page 3 - Propagation tools

Page 4 - What was done?

Page 5 - Mean number of stochastic energy losses

Page 6 - mmc results

Page 7 - mudedx results

Page 8 - propmu results

Page 9 - results

Page 10 - energy distribution

Page 11 - Probability to get an interaction

Page 12 - Bremsstrahlung

Page 13 - Delta electrons

Page 14 - pairproduction

Page 15 - nuclear scattering

Page 16 - evs results

Page 17 - mmc results

Page 18 - mudedx results

Page 19 - propmu results

Page 20 - mum results

Page 21 - Conclusion

Author: H. Geenen

E-Mail: geenen@physik.uni-wuppertal.de

Homepage: http://amanda.uni-wuppertal.de/~geenen

Summary:

I present results from checks on muon propagation implementations in the energy range from 0.7 TeV to 2 PeV and if their output can be considered physical. Monoenergetic muon samples have been created and propagated 2000 meters through ice with mudedx, propmu and mmc. The number of stochastic energy losses above a given threshold was investigated as well as the energy spectrum of these (the secondary tracks).

1.) When increasing the energy the mudedx and propmu energy losses stagnate at 33 resp. 4 tracks, whereas mmc energy losses rise from 10 tracks at 0.7 TeV to 360 tracks at 2 PeV, as is physically expected.
2.) The physical expectation of the distribution of energy losses has been calculated analytically. The comparison to the propagation tools shows that mudedx and propmu lead to an unphysical 'jelly bag cap-structure'.
3.) A brief comparision to P.Desiati's mum results is given.

Conclusion: The use of mudedx and propmu is therefore discouraged, mmc and mum represent the physical expectation.

Edited with:
StarOffice